It delivers a defined scope in six phases — land feasibility, entitlement support, product and unit mix, brand and pricing, phased release, and sellout and closeout — with named deliverables at each phase, a named owner for each deliverable, and a written statement of what you supply so the schedule does not stall on a missing survey. That is the whole answer. Most brokerage pages answer this question with adjectives because a process is falsifiable and adjectives are not. Below is the process, what is negotiable in it, and what we will not put in writing because we cannot substantiate it.
For scale: Residential Strategies, Inc. reported 11,106 annual starts and 9,777 annual closings in the Dallas–Fort Worth market as of the first quarter of 2026. That is the volume a development sales program operates inside, and it is the number we would size absorption assumptions against — carefully, because a metro figure is not a submarket figure and neither is a proxy for your community.
Feasibility is a brokerage function on a development deal, not a courtesy. The work is comparable-sale and comparable-community analysis at the submarket level, an inventory read on directly competing sections, a first view of who the buyer for this location actually is, and a written statement of the constraints that would kill the deal.
The constraint list is where a broker earns the engagement. Entitlement posture, district load, impact fee exposure, access and utility reach, and — on ag-valued ground — the rollback consequence of a change of use. That last one is a real number, and it is smaller than most published sources say: the lookback is three years with no interest for a change of use on or after June 15, 2021. Our rollback taxes page covers it, and our land due diligence checklist is the sequence we run.
Deliverables: a written feasibility memo, a competing-community inventory schedule, a preliminary buyer profile, and a constraint list with the open items named. What we need from you: the survey, the title commitment, any existing engineering, and the acquisition structure you are contemplating.
We do not entitle land. Your engineer, your land use counsel, and your consultants do that. What a sales partner contributes is market evidence for the record and schedule discipline against the statutory clock.
The clock is real and it is worth planning against. Under Local Government Code §212.009 as rewritten by House Bill 3167, a municipality has 30 days to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove a plat, and a plat is approved by operation of law if it does none of those. Under §212.0091 a disapproval must be in writing, must state each specific reason, and must cite the ordinance or statute each reason rests on. Our plat approval page covers the full cycle including the 15-day response window.
Deliverables: absorption and pricing evidence formatted for public hearing use, a market narrative supporting the requested density and product type, and a release schedule modeled against the entitlement calendar rather than against optimism. What we need from you: the entitlement schedule your engineer is actually working to, and standing access to your consultant team.
This is the phase with the highest leverage and the one most often skipped, because by the time a brokerage is hired the plans are usually drawn. Unit mix, lot width distribution, plan count, elevation strategy, garage orientation, and the option and upgrade structure all decide the pace and the price you will realize, and all of them are cheap to change on paper and expensive to change in dirt.
Deliverables: a recommended unit mix by lot type with the comparable evidence behind each recommendation, a plan-count recommendation, an option and upgrade strategy with margin logic, and a written dissent when we disagree with a decision so the record is clear. What we need from you: preliminary plats, plan sets, and a builder or builders identified — including, because Texas has no state homebuilder license, the direct diligence on that builder that a licensing regime would otherwise have done for you.
Brand work here means positioning and naming, the identity system, the sales environment, the photography and rendering program, the digital presence, and the collateral the sales floor uses daily. Pricing means a base price schedule by plan and lot, a premium schedule, an incentive framework, and a written escalation policy tied to release absorption rather than to instinct.
It also means the disclosure architecture, which is a marketing deliverable whether or not anyone calls it one. If the community sits in a public improvement district, Property Code §5.014 requires a prescribed written notice signed by the seller before a binding contract exists. If it sits in a MUD or another Water Code Chapter 49 district, §49.452 requires its own notice in the form prescribed by §49.4521, and a buyer who never received it may terminate and recover costs, interest, and attorney's fees. Our page on MUD and PID disclosure covers both. The sales process has to be built so those notices execute in the right order every time, not most of the time.
Deliverables: the positioning statement and name, the identity and collateral system, the sales environment plan, the price and premium schedules, the incentive and escalation framework, and a documented contract-and-disclosure sequence. What we need from you: the builder's contract form and addenda set, current district information, and a named person authorized to approve pricing.
The discipline that makes this work is unglamorous: release rules written before the first release, and reporting that does not soften a bad month.
The last fifteen percent of a community behaves differently from the first eighty-five. Remaining inventory is the inventory nobody chose, spec strategy has to shift, warranty questions start arriving, and the developer's attention has usually moved to the next tract. Deliverables: a remaining-inventory strategy, a spec and standing-inventory plan, an HOA and transition handoff, and a written closeout report with the actual absorption, pricing, and cancellation data. That report is useful mostly because it makes the next deal's feasibility memo honest.
Phase | What we deliver | What you supply |
|---|---|---|
Land feasibility | Feasibility memo, competing-inventory schedule, buyer profile, constraint list | Survey, title commitment, existing engineering, acquisition structure |
Entitlement support | Market evidence for hearings, density and product narrative, release schedule against the plat clock | Engineer and counsel team, working entitlement schedule |
Product and unit mix | Mix and plan-count recommendations with comparable evidence, option and upgrade strategy | Preliminary plats, plan sets, identified builder |
Brand and pricing | Positioning and name, identity and collateral, sales environment, price and premium schedules, incentive framework, disclosure sequence | Contract form and addenda, district information, pricing decision-maker |
Phased release | Release rules, qualified interest list, weekly velocity and conversion reporting, decision-point recommendations | Delivery schedule, inventory availability, timely pricing decisions |
Sellout and closeout | Remaining-inventory strategy, spec plan, HOA transition support, written closeout report | Warranty and service posture, HOA documents |
Compensation on development work is structured, not quoted off a page. In practice it is built from three components, and each is negotiated in the engagement document.
We will not publish a rate, a percentage, or a marketing budget figure on a web page. They vary by deal size, product type, phase count, and how much of the scope you are already carrying in-house, and a number posted here would be wrong for most readers and used by all of them. What is not negotiable is that all three components are in writing before work starts.
We will not promise an absorption pace, a sellout date, a price appreciation figure, or a return. We do not have a basis to promise any of them, and a brokerage that does is either guessing or is making a claim it cannot substantiate. What we will do is write down the assumptions, show the evidence under each one, and report the variance every week in the same format whether the news is good or bad.
Our Land + Ranch division handles the acquisition and disposition side of this work, including North Texas land and land dispositions. If you have a tract and a question about whether it supports a program at all, that is the conversation to start with.
Market sizing is from Residential Strategies, Inc., Q1 2026 Dallas–Fort Worth data: 11,106 annual starts and 9,777 annual closings, attributed to Residential Strategies. Statutory references are to Texas Local Government Code §212.009 and §212.0091 as amended by House Bill 3167, 86th Legislature; Texas Property Code §5.014; Texas Water Code §49.452 and §49.4521; and Texas Tax Code §23.55 as amended by House Bill 1743, 86th Legislature, and House Bill 3833, 87th Legislature. Verified August 2026 and current as of that date. No commission rate, fee percentage, marketing budget, or absorption figure is stated here; those are deal-specific and are set in the engagement document. This is general information, not legal or tax advice.
The Agency Dallas is independently owned and operated by Damon & Megan Williamson. Damon Williamson, Broker-Owner · Licensed Real Estate Agent, State of Texas. Dallas, Dallas County, Texas 75225. Equal Housing Opportunity. Texas Real Estate Commission Information About Brokerage Services and Consumer Protection Notice are available at trec.texas.gov. This is not intended as a solicitation of property currently listed for sale.