The Texas wildlife exemption is not a separate exemption. It is 1-d-1 open-space appraisal continued under a different qualifying use, so the land must already carry ag valuation the year before you convert. Under Tax Code §23.51(7) you have to perform at least three of seven wildlife management practices and file a management plan with the county appraisal district by April 30.
Texas Parks and Wildlife says it plainly: there is no agricultural exemption or wildlife exemption for open-space land. One valuation, two ways to keep it.
Voters amended Article VIII of the Texas Constitution in 1995 to add wildlife management to the uses that qualify land for open-space appraisal. It did not create a second program. It added a lane to the existing one.
The practical consequence is the entry requirement. Under §23.51(7)(A), the land must be qualified open-space land at the time the wildlife management use begins. You cannot take a bare tract with no agricultural history and go straight to wildlife. You convert land that already qualifies, so the five-of-seven-year history on the ag exemption page has to be there first.
The second consequence is financial: converting is revenue neutral. The land is still appraised on productive agricultural value, so the tax bill does not drop because you switched to wildlife. What changes is what you have to do to keep it.
Section 23.51(7) requires the land to be used to propagate a sustaining breeding, migrating, or wintering population of indigenous wild animals for human use — food, medicine, or recreation — in at least three of these seven ways.
# | Practice | What it looks like in North Texas |
|---|---|---|
1 | Habitat control | Prescribed burning, brush sculpting, native grass restoration |
2 | Erosion control | Gully shaping, terracing, streamside plantings |
3 | Predator control | Documented control of species suppressing the target population |
4 | Providing supplemental water | Guzzlers, wetland restoration, maintained troughs, spring development |
5 | Providing supplemental food | Food plots, feeders, managed grazing that leaves forage |
6 | Providing shelters | Nest boxes, brush piles, half-cutting, snag retention |
7 | Making census counts | Spotlight counts, herd composition counts, track counts |
Three is the floor, not the target. Districts want practices that fit the target species and the ecoregion, at a scale that matters on your acreage.
Section 23.51(7)(B) offers an alternate path for land protecting a federally listed endangered species under a conservation easement or habitat conservation plan. It is narrow, and not the route most owners take.
Under 34 Texas Administrative Code §9.2005, there is no minimum acreage for wildlife management use — unless the tract has been reduced in acreage since January 1 of the preceding tax year. If it has, the district applies a minimum expressed as a percentage of the tract's earlier size, set by ecoregion.
Ecoregion | Minimum acreage range |
|---|---|
Cross Timbers and Prairies | 93 to 95 percent |
Blackland Prairie | 92 to 94 percent |
Post Oak Savannah | 92 to 94 percent |
Those three cover most of the North Texas counties we work. Lower ranges, around 90 to 92 percent, apply to tracts in a wildlife management property association and to land designated as habitat for an endangered, threatened, or candidate species. Section 9.2005 also grandfathers tracts continuously qualified since January 1, 2002 that are at least as large as they were on January 1, 2009.
The rule exists to stop a 200-acre ranch from being cut into 5-acre tracts. If you are not subdividing, it does not reach you.
The plan goes to the county appraisal district, not to Texas Parks and Wildlife. That trips people up every year.
Under 34 TAC §9.2003, the plan is submitted on the form prescribed by TPWD — PWD 885-W7000 — and has to include ownership and property description, current use, your goals and objectives, the target indigenous species, the three or more practices, and the specific activities under each. A district may accept a plan on another form. It may not require one.
How the conversion runs:
Not much in money. A meaningful amount in attention.
There is no lease check coming in, so the ongoing cost is your time and materials: seed, feeders, nest boxes, brush equipment, and the hours to run counts and keep records. Against that, you drop the cattle, the fence they require, and the hay bill — see what it costs to own a ranch.
The real cost is documentation. A grazing lease proves itself. Wildlife management does not. Owners lose wildlife valuation for one reason above all others: they did the work and did not write it down.
The honest version, because most pages on this subject will not give it to you.
It fits the owner who wants the land for hunting, birding, or quiet, and does not want cattle on it. It fits smaller tracts where the county's grazing degree-of-intensity standard is hard to meet. It fits owners already improving habitat who would rather get credit for it. It fits families holding a place through a generation that will not run a cow-calf operation.
It does not fit an owner who wants a hands-off arrangement, or land that is not already in ag valuation, or anyone hoping for a lower tax bill.
If the goal is the lowest defensible tax bill on land you will not actively manage, a grazing or hay lease with a neighbor is the simpler answer. And if the use lapses entirely, you are into rollback taxes.
Not as a separate exemption. Texas Parks and Wildlife states there is no agricultural exemption or wildlife exemption for open-space land. What exists is 1-d-1 open-space appraisal under Article VIII of the Texas Constitution, and wildlife management is a qualifying use that keeps it in place, added by amendment in 1995.
Under 34 TAC §9.2005 there is no minimum acreage unless the tract has been reduced in size since January 1 of the preceding tax year. If it has, the tract must retain a set percentage of its earlier acreage — 93 to 95 percent in the Cross Timbers and Prairies, 92 to 94 percent in the Blackland Prairie and Post Oak Savannah.
Yes. Tax Code §23.51(7)(A) requires the land to be qualified open-space land at the time the wildlife management use begins, so it must already be appraised as 1-d-1 open-space land. Wildlife management continues an existing valuation under a different qualifying use. It is not a way to qualify raw land.
No. Converting from agricultural use to wildlife management use is revenue neutral. The land is still appraised on productive agricultural value, and the tax assessed does not change. What changes is the qualifying activity and the documentation the district expects each year.
With the county appraisal district, not with Texas Parks and Wildlife. Under 34 TAC §9.2003 the plan is submitted on TPWD form PWD 885-W7000 and attached to Comptroller form 50-129, filed between January 1 and April 30. A district may accept another form but may not require one.
Possibly. Under 34 TAC §9.2003(g), a chief appraiser may require an annual report documenting the wildlife management activities performed during the year. Districts differ, so ask yours. Either way, keep dated photographs, receipts, census sheets, and burn records — the burden of proving continued qualifying use sits with you.
Sources and method
Texas Constitution Article VIII §1-d-1, as amended 1995 · Texas Tax Code §§23.51(7), 23.521, and 23.54 · 34 Texas Administrative Code §§9.2001 through 9.2005, Comptroller rules for qualification of agricultural land in wildlife management use · Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Comprehensive Wildlife Management Planning Guidelines and form PWD 885-W7000 · Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts form 50-129 · Figures verified August 2026.
County appraisal districts set their own degree-of-intensity and acreage standards. Confirm current requirements with the appraisal district for the county your land sits in before you rely on anything here. This is general information, not tax or legal advice.
If you are looking at a North Texas tract you would rather manage for wildlife than for cattle, call us before you write the offer — the ag status on the day you close decides whether wildlife is even on the table. Start at Texas Land & Ranch.
The Agency Dallas is independently owned and operated by Damon & Megan Williamson.
Damon Williamson, Broker-Owner · Licensed Real Estate Agent, State of Texas.
Dallas, Dallas County, Texas 75205. Equal Housing Opportunity.
Texas Real Estate Commission Information About Brokerage Services and Consumer Protection Notice are available at trec.texas.gov.
This is not intended as a solicitation of property currently listed for sale.